Quora讨论,印度能否在未来10年内超过中国?印度网友悲观认为:印度绝对不是下一个中国!

2022.4.28 发布在 世界看中国 栏目

Quora讨论,印度能否在未来10年内超过中国?印度网友悲观认为:印度绝对不是下一个中国! 世界看中国-第1张

Quora网友讨论:

Muhammad asif M

I would like to add one thing most people in India do not get a quality education.If the people get a quality education(early stage)wrt their field(people should aware of all fields and they have to choose their field)then it would lead t hem to unification,productivity,innovation
我想补充一件事,大多数印度人得不到高质量的教育。如果人们早期阶段在自己感兴趣或擅长的领域接受了优质教育(人们应该对所有领域有所了解,并且对自己感兴趣或者擅长的领域做出选择),那么这将引导他们走向统一、提高生产力、实现创新。

Bharath MS

I have to disagree on this,internet is full of quality education free of cost,and network cost in India is cheapest in the world so it’s time to stop blaming education system.
我不同意这个观点,互联网上有很多免费的优质教育,印度的网络费用是世界上最便宜的,所以现在是时候停止将问题归结在教育系统上。

Krishna Mohan

Is kejriwal not well educated?He was in finances,yet he is doing things which are against the law of economics.Like a n uneducated politician he is distributing freebies and taking populist measures to please voters.
凯杰利瓦尔(kejriwal)没有受过良好的教育吗?他是学财务的,但他却在做违反经济法的事情。就像一个没有受过教育的政客一样,他正在分发免费赠品并采取平民主义措施来取悦选民。(译注:印度平民党主席埃尔维德,凯杰利瓦尔)

You Me Else-?????????

Hello akshat,could you cite examples/case studies on which welfare schemes or freebie schemes that are/were implemente d on a national/state level scale but failed/failing to benefit to the concerned community.It would be much helpful to gi ve us clarity on which schemes you call freebies.
Thanks note:this is my first ever comment on YouTube.Thanks a lot for educating us on macro economics.??
你好,阿克萨特(akshat,博主),你能不能举例说明哪些福利计划或免费计划在国家/州一级的规模上实施了,但未能惠及相关社区。如果能让我们清楚地了解哪些计划是免费的,那将是非常有帮助的。谢谢:这是我第一次在油管上发表评论。非常感谢你给我们讲解宏观经济知识。

anonymous anyone

Unification is much more difficult to achieve in India as there is much more diversity compared to largely homogeneous Ch inese society,whether it is differences in religion,jobs,rich vs poor etc,this is a matter which can never be solved because you cannot appease one section without the other section feeling alienated or offended.But we can overcome this to an extent by instilling a Uniform Civil Code which will help reduce differences.Also lower taxation for middle class(b oth direct&indirect)to bolster their purchasing power.
在印度实现统一要困难得多,因为与大体上同质化的中国社会相比,印度更具多样性,无论是宗教、工作,还是富人与穷人等方面的差异,这都是一个永远无法解决的问题,因为你不可能在安抚一部分人的同时不让另一部分人感到被疏远或被冒犯。但我们可以在一定程度上克服这一点,通过灌输一套统一的民法典,这将有助于减少分歧。同时降低中产阶级的税收(包括直接和间,接税收),以提高他们的购买力。

Shirley

On the whole,the time difference between the economic strength of China and India in 1990 is not very large,and the lev el of economic development of the two countries is roughly the same.However,after more than 1o years of changes,China’s economic strength has an overwhelming advantage over India’s economic strength,and the level of economic development canalso be said to be higher than that of India.For example,in the United Nations classification of per capita income,Ind ia belongs to low-income countries,while China belongs to middle-income countries as early as 2001.
从整体上来说,中国和印度的经济实力在1990年时差距还不是很大,两国经济发展的水平大致相当。但是经过10多年的变化,中国的经济实力相对印度的经济实力已经出现了压倒的优势,经济发展水平和印度相比也可以说要高出一个档次。比如说在联合国按人均收入分类中,印度属于低收入国家,而中国则早在2001年就属于中等收入国家之列了。

Andrew

Different investment strategies are a major factor in the widening gap in economic strength between China and India.Altho ugh India began its economic reform and opening-up in 1991,India has not made special efforts in terms of investment.For example,according to the statistics of the United Nations,the investment proportion of all low-income countries in 2003was 22%of the GDP of that year,while the investment proportion of India was 23%of the GDP,that is to say,the investm ent proportion of India was roughly the same as the average level of the investment proportion of all low-income countries,while the investment proportion of China far exceeded the world average level.In 2004,the average investment proportion of all countries in the world was 21.9%of GDP,while that of China was as high as 42.4%,Since China’s investment ratio has remained high since 1990,China’s GDP growth rate has far been in the forefront of the world.From 1990 to 2004,China’s GDP average growth rate was close to 10%,while India’s GDP average growth rate was only about 6%in the same period,although it was also quite good.
不同的投资战略是造成中国和印度经济实力差距拉大的一个主要因素。
虽然印度在1991年开始了经济的改革开放,但是就投资而言,印度并没有特别加大力度。比如说,在联合国统计的所有低收入,国家2003年的投资比例为当年GDP的22%,而印度的投资比例为GDP的23%,也就是说印度的投资比例和所有低收入国家的投资比例的平均水平大致相当,而中国的投资比例则远远超出了世界的平均水平,在2004年全世界所有国家的平均投资比例为GDP的21.9%,而中国则高达42.4%,由于中国的投资比例从1990年以来一直居高不下,因此中国的GDP的增长率就远远走在了世界的前列,从1990年到2004年,中国GDP的平均增长率接近10%,而印度虽然也相当不错,但是在同期GDP的平均增长率只能是6%左右。

Allw

China’s own strength in economy and other aspects has been significantly improved and increased in recent years.It is pr ecisely for this reason that the US government has chosen to regard China as its very strong competitor and wants to suppress China through various unilateralist measures,because in the view of the United States,it can ensure that the hegemon y of the United States will not be affected.
中国自身在经济等各个方面的实力,在这些年都出现了十分明显的提升和增长。也正是由于这项原因,美国政府选择将中国当成了自己十分强力的竞争对手,想要通过各种单边主义措施对中国进行打压,因为在美国看来者能够确保美国的霸主地位不受影响。

Yang Ji

in the age of supply chain break down,only the one with complete supply chain can keep up economic growth.So my advice is that India should build a competitive domestic supply chain,control most of the core technology,and build up its infrastructure.China had moved on from semi-skilled labour intensive manufacture.China gonna move to robot intensive and capital intensive high value added manufacturing and manufacture related servicing,It will take at least another two decades to get to where China is today,if India can manage to have a whole of society political reform and legislative reform.O therwise I am not really optimistic about India’s economic future.
在供应链断裂的时代,只有拥有完整供应链的企业才能跟上经济增长的步伐。所以我的建议是,印度应该建立有竞争力的国内供应链,控制大部分核心技术,建设基础设施。中国已经从半熟练的劳动密集型制造业发展转向机器人密集型和资本密集型高附加值制造和制造相关服务。如果印度能够进行全社会政治改革和立法改革,至少还需要二十年才能达到今天的中国的水平。否,则我对印度的经济前景并不抱有乐观的态度。

Pratik

Unfortunately we will not,because of the politics Its so unfortunate
不幸的是,由于政治斗争,我们不会这么做。太不幸了。

Suraj Sah

The knowledge i gain about world finance,world history,finance how economy work is more than i learn from school life.
It’s become interesting when you make in such an easy to understable language.If we have teachers like you in school we n ever get bored for sure
在这里我学到的关于世界金融、世界历史、金融经济如何运作的知识,比我从学校生活中学到的更多。当你用如此简单易懂的语言来表达时,它就变得有趣了。如果我们在学校有你这样的老师,我们肯定不会感到无聊。

WING MEDIA

If we need to grow first and biggest step is to remove communalism(hindu muslim fight)and improve education system(free and skill based)?
如果我们需要发展,第一步也是最大的一步就是消除宗教冲突(印度教和穆斯林的斗争),改善教育系统(实施义务教育以及技能教育)

Raghav Sridhar

Sir India is never going to be china In china land approval is very fast no room for protests,also here corrupt officials and politician want cut for develo pment projects even after 70+ years of independence no bullet train Still we are struggling for basic infrastructure where as chima is way ahead
先生,印度永远不会成为中国。
在中国,土地审批非常快,没有抗议的空间,而且印度的腐败官员和政客想要削减发展项目,即使在独立70多年后,也没有高铁。
印度仍然在为最基本的基础设施而艰苦奋斗,而中国在这方面已经遥遥领先了。

bharat kapoor

Bullet train is never need of india make the Indian railways Better
印度永远不需要高铁,先改善印度的铁路吧。

Physics for You

@bharat kapoor??
Bullock-Carts are good,environment friendly also
牛车很好,也很环保。

bharat kapoor

@Physics for You because metro in some cities already failed
因为一些城市的地铁项目已经失败了。

Abbi A

Till general public mindset of always receiving freebies exist,with which thy r easily lured this situation will exist
因为公众存在总是有着接受免费赠品的心态,他们很容易被诱惑,这种情况就会存在。

Mogambo

@bharat kapoor think about future bhai metros are a failure now but when cities grow they will need them.And cities are growing big time especially industrialized cities.
想想未来吧,现在的地铁是失败的,但当城市发展时,他们会需要地铁。而城市正在蓬勃发展,特别是工业化城市。

Physics for You

@bharat kapoor bez metro failed in some cities already,So Shut down delhi,kolkata metro??
因为一些地铁项目已经在一些城市落地失败了,所以关闭德里,加尔各答的地铁?

bharat kapoor

@Abbi A hyper capitalist is also not good see USA education debt and healthcare cost and see north and west europe free e ducation free HEALTHCARE and capitalism in other sectors
超级资本主义也不好,看看美国的教育债务和医疗费用,看看北欧和西欧的免费教育、免费医疗和资本主义下的其他领域。

bharat kapoor

@Physics for You delhi metro was big success
德里地铁获得巨大成功。

Abbi A

@bharat kapoor hyper welfare is More dangerous.It’s not only the government,it’s the public.Their mindset need to be s hifted frm freebie receivers to hardworking creators.
超福利体系是更危险的。这不仅是政府的问题,也是公众的问题。他们的心态需要从等着免费的政府救助转变为勤劳的创造者

Manan Aron

Tbh we don’t need a bullet train.We need to make our railway system more efficient.Also distribute the crowd by building more metros or improving other transportation services.With the petrol diesel price increase the transportation system is already facing many difficulties so its better to focus on renewable energy or electrification of railways and building metros.Mumbai metros is successful by the way.
老实说,我们不需要高铁。我们需要使我们的铁路系统更有效率。同时通过建设更多的地铁或改善其他交通服务来给交通分流随着汽油柴油价格的上涨,交通系统已经面临很多困难,所以最好把重点放在可再生能源或铁路电气化和建设地铁上。顺便说一句,孟买的地铁是成功的。

bharat kapoor

@Abbi A education n healthcare should not be capitalist
教育和医疗保健体系不应该是资本主义的。

Kumar Abhishek

@bharat kapoor What an illogical statement!
A poor mentality will keep you remain poor.
Bullet train is a major technological advancement for our transport infrastructure.
We need this technology so that we can build upon it.
Metros are lifeline of cities.
No one wants to travel in jam packed normal trains and daily ridership of all metros are at all time high.
So ur comparision is totally baseless.
多么不符合逻辑的说法啊!
贫穷的心态会让你一直贫穷下去。
高铁是我们交通基础设施的一项重大技术进步。
我们需要这项技术,以便我们能够在此基础上继续发展。
地铁是城市的生命线。没有人愿意乘坐拥挤不堪的普通列车,所有地铁的日乘客量都处于历史最高水平。此外,高铁项目和其他铁路改善项目是相互独立的。所以你的比较是完全没有根据的。

Kumar Abhishek

@bharat kapoor
If education won’t be open to private sector,who will do million dollar research and development in universities??
Government can’t provide quality education and healthcare to entire 100%population of a country especially a country whe re 6%people pay income tax.
Government has to spend lots of money on oil imports and infrastructure also.
如果教育不向私营部门开放,谁将在大学里进行数百万美元的研发?
政府无法为一个国家的全部人口提供优质的教育和医疗保健,尤其在一个只6%的人缴纳所得税的国家。政府还必须在石油进口和基础设施上花费大量资金。

bharat kapoor

@Kumar Abhishek ask the same question to west and north europe and USA don’t have bullet train And there is report bullet train is not feasible in india just like metro failed in SOME cities
向西欧和北欧提出同样的问题,美国也没有高铁。
有报道称高铁在印度不可行,就像地铁在一些城市也没有办法成功落地一样。

Kumar Abhishek

@bharat kapoor
That’s y Americans have to pay over inflated flight tickets to travel distances above 1000 km.
Haven’t u heard of TGV of France,talgo of spain and the trains connecting whole of western EU nations?
Get urself acquainted.
Bullet train is build only after feasibility study is done and the underconstructing one has already gone through one suc h report and got approved by shinkansen manufacturer of Japan.
So,ai believe two person on YouTube can’t make decide whether bullet trains are feasible or not.
这就是为什么美国人如果进行超过1000公里的距离的旅行,就需要购买高额的机票。
难道你没有听说过法国的高速铁路系统,西班牙的列车制造商TALGO和连接整个西方欧盟国家的火车吗?
你自己去了解一下,高铁只有在完成可行性研究后才能建造,正在建造的列车已经通过了可行性研究,并得到了日本新干线制造商的批准。
所以,我相信油管上的两个人的讨论不能决定高铁在某个国家是不是可行的。

bharat kapoor

@Kumar Abhishek europe is continent they have free border anyone can travel read about how USA road network also help to make money
欧洲是一个大洲,他们有自由的边界,任何人都可以进行自由自在的旅行,还有就是了解下美国的公路网也能挣钱的信息吧。

bharat kapoor

@Kumar Abhishek just like metro train of Pune and Jaipur are.made after feasibility study
就像浦那和斋浦尔的地铁一样,都是经过可行性研究后才实施建设的。

Abbi A

agree for education n healthcare n even senior citizen care.But making youth bum,worthless,spoiling them,is not going to take us anywhere.
我同意教育、医疗、甚至老年人护理是非常重要的。但是,让年轻人虚度青春,变得一无是处,宠坏他们,对我们的国家发展毫无益处。

bharat kapoor

@Abbi A senior citizens not monetary help but emotional help
老年人不是需要金钱上的帮助,而是情感上的帮助。

Abbi A

@bharat kapoor from govnt I m talking It can provide only monetary help.
我说的是政府。它只能提供金钱上的帮助。

Abbi A

@bharat kapoor exactly.Our tax we pay for development not for politicians benefits.
正是如此。我们的税收是为了发展,而不是为了政治家的利益。

Sk Jameel Akhtar

Agreed with your point.
However we are developing,although slowly in my opinion.I’m highly optimistic about India as we will be seeing high inv olvement of educated and honest people because we can check,recheck,cross-check now and I think voice of the people is f inally becoming broader.
同意你的观点。
然而,我们正在发展,尽管在我看来很缓慢。我对印度的未来仍然非常乐观,因为我们将看到受过教育和诚实的人的高度参与
国家发展的全过程,因为我们现在可以进行检查、再检查、交叉检查,我认为人民的声音终于变得更有力了。

Prashant Singh

@bharat kapoor Metros are a failure??Very good joke,Delhi,Kolkata,Bangalore metros are working out pretty well,simil arly Mumbai metro has also been a huge success,remember its only through mega in frastructure projects that a country can generate sustainable employment and bring people out of poverty,not from distributing money to poor and wasting taxpayer money
地铁项目失败了?开玩笑吧,德里、加尔各答、班加罗尔的地铁运行良好,孟买地铁同样取得了巨大的成功,请记住,只有通过大型基础设施项目,一个国家才能创造可持续的就业机会并让人们摆脱贫困,而不是通过发钱给穷人,这样只会浪费纳税人的

bharat kapoor

@Prashant Singh o yes by distributing free education and healthcare west and north europe is doing bad and hyper capitali st USA Student are in debt non healthy people who having disease are in debt
是的,通过分配免费教育和医疗保健,西欧和北欧的情况很糟糕,而超资本主义的美国学生则负债累累,患有疾病而不健康的人也负债累累。

Prashant Singh

@bharat kapoor Free education and healthcare should be distributed to poor who cannot afford,it should not be distribute d to rich,first go and learn some economics
免费教育和医疗应该分配给负担不起的穷人,不应该分配给富人,先去学点经济学吧。

Prashant Singh

@bharat kapoor Even in USA free healthcare is not for rich,it’s for poor and lower middle class,go and check the ground reality
即使在美国,免费医疗也不是为富人提供的,而是为穷人和中下层阶级提供的,去了解一下实际情况吧。

Prashant Singh

@bharat kapoor So even if it’s Rs 5000 it’s reasonable,when you can pay Rs 5000 for a flight ticket why can’t you pay Rs 5000 for a bullet train ticket??
因此,就算高铁票价是5000卢比也是合理的,当你可以为一张机票支付5000卢比时,为什么不能为一张高铁支付5000卢比呢?

bharat kapoor

@Prashant Singh it should be given to everyone free fair and equal education so that race can be start from same point fo r everyone and if private institutions and private hospitals are there it should be caped with a upper limit so that every one can go and study and get treatment in low cost
应该给每个人提供免费的公平和平等的教育,这样每个人竞争的起点都是统一的,如果有私人机构和私人医院,也应该有上限,这样每个人都可以去学习,并得到低成本的治疗。

bharat kapoor

@Prashant Singh go and see west and north europe richest man and poor man both travel in public transport like bus and me tro both go for treatment in same hospital
去了解一下一西欧和北欧最富有的人和最贫穷的人都乘坐公共交通工具,如公共汽车和地铁,都在同一个医院接受治疗。

Prashant Singh

@bharat kapoor Boss go and check whether rich people are getting subsidies are not,the fact is they are not getting,on ly poor get it,there is specific eligibility criteria for getting subsidies
老板去看看富人是否得到补贴,事实是他们没有得到,只有穷人才能得到补贴,需要有特定的资格标准才能得到补贴。

Prashant Singh

@bharat kapoor That can only happen when your GDP is $50 trillion so as of now India cannot afford it
只有当你的GDP达到50万亿美元时才会进行补贴,所以到现在为止,印度还负担不起大规模的补贴。

bharat kapoor

@Prashant Singh reduce your corruption everything can be happen we have enough resources for need but not for greed
减少你的腐败,这些都有可能成为现实,我们有足够的资源来满足需求,但不能用来满足某些人的贪梦。

bharat kapoor

@Prashant Singh what subsidy you are talking about?
你说的是什么补贴?

bharat kapoor

@Prashant Singh free education and healthcare both rich and poor are getting in west and north europe
在西欧和北欧,富人和穷人都能获得免费教育和医疗。

Sumeet Shekher

What I personally think about the current problem with unemployment is that we are too dependent on IT Services.As a cou ntry we should emphasize a lot on local manufacturing facilities as a country we aren’t even capable of manufacturing quality stationary products for export markets.We are so happy with mediocrity.Everyone is happy in jumping on a bandwagon o f becoming rich because india is predominantly a poor country on alot of standards.
对于目前的失业问题,我个人认为是我们过于依赖IT服务。作为一个国家,我们应该充分重视本地制造设施,因为我们甚至没有能力为出口市场制造高质量的固定产品。我们满足于平庸的生活。每个人都乐于向上冲成为富人的行列,但是印度在很多标准上都还是一个贫穷的国家。

Madara Uchiha

India can never be the next China India will always be India????
印度永远不可能成为下一个中国,印度永远是印度。

Nobu Francis

Boycotting Chinese goods is not the answer.India shies away from participating in global trade.India hardly manufacturesgoods and our exports are a fraction of the global trade….less than 3%.China does just the opposite.They are very ac tive in producing goods and in world trade.They are the biggest exporters of manufactured goods and earn valuable foreign exchange.China unlike India stresses on education and health care.Their population is very educated and skilled to take up jobs in manufacturing.All these factors have made the Chinese very rich and prosperous.
抵制中国商品并不是解决方案。印度回避参与全球贸易。印度几乎不制造商品,我们的出口只占全球贸易的一小部分,不到3%。中国的做法恰恰相反。他们在生产货物和世界贸易方面非常积极。他们是最大的制成品出口国,赚取宝贵的外汇。与印度不同,中国强调教育和医疗保健。他们的人口受过很好的教育,有技能,可以从事制造业的工作。所有这些因素都帮助中国人变得更加富有,过上繁荣的生活。

Vivian Sarky

Every single video I watch I learn something new.Thank you for putting out such informative content.
我看的每一个视频都能学到新东西。谢谢你提供如此详实的内容。

RAJ KARMAKAR

The main reason for Venezuela’s downfall was US Sanctions….Not just welfare politics
委内瑞拉衰落的主要原因是美国的制裁,不仅仅是因为福利政治。

Aditya SK

Not exactly.They were able to afford welfare when the oil prices were high,but when the oil prices went down they could no longer afford it
并非如此。在油价高的时候,他们还能负担得起福利,但当油价下跌时,他们就再也负担不起了。

harsh2945

@Aditya S Khe is ignoring most contributing factor..plus not considering population number and natures gift..welfare c an work only with less population and abundant natural resources!
他忽略了最重要的因素,再加上没有考虑到人口数量和大自然的资源,只有在人口较少和自然资源丰富的情况下,福利才能发挥作用。

amitabh Banerji

@harsh2945 you mean,welfare works where welfare is not needed.As banks give you loan where you have collateral but evenif borrower is deserving but has no collateral he will not get loan.State does not work like banks.Too many factors are at play.
你的意思是,福利在不需要福利的地方才能发挥作用略。当银行给你贷款时,你得有抵押品,但即使借款人值得获得贷款,但没有抵押品,他也不会得到贷款。尽管国家不像银行那样运作。还受很多其他因素的影响。

Saravanan Balusamy

I love your way of presentation with lot of facts through graphs
我喜欢你通过图表展示大量事实的方式。

An Indian

Wrong Title bro,first we have to Beat Bangladesh then eligible to think about China,at least during MODI Tenure No way to beat china,not even Bangladesh
错了,兄弟,首先我们必须打败孟加拉国,然后才有资格考虑中国,至少在莫迪任期内,没有办法打败中国,甚至孟加拉国也没有打败。

Shodhit Goyal

Such a pessimist you are ignoring modis good doings.Criticism is good but blindly criticising a person is worst.
你真是个悲观主义者,忽视了莫迪做的好事。。批评是好事,但盲目地批评一个人是最糟糕的。

Dhanabal Shanmugam

Hi Akshat,you are an thought leader!!I watch all your videos and every single word from is crisp,direct and thoughtful!!You should consult india’s planning commision to make a better india.I was looking for this kind of video to understand our situation better..
晦,Akshat,你是一个思想领袖!我看了你所有的视频,所说的每一个字都很清晰,直接,有思想。你应该给印度的规划委员会当顾问,以建立一个更好的印度。我一直在寻找这样的视频来更好地了解我们的情况。

Sandeep

China started dumping in tones 10 years back only that time people were making fun of its product but clearly they were h aving options for each and every small and large,product many countries politician and knowingly ignore it,China slowly improved on it fixed supply chain issues
10年前,中国开始大量倾销,只是在人们取笑其产品,但显然他们的产品包罗万象,给人们提供充分的选择,许多国家的政客故意忽略它,中国在解决供应链问题上慢慢改进。

Ramachandran Murali

India has done amazing reforms for ease of doing business from 2014.This guy cannot even read what has been done and how India has moved to 6srd in World bank ranking There is an entire study done on the reforms done by India across Business life cycle.In short the reforms are as follows.Detailed explanation can be sent in mail if any one needs.a)starting abusiness b)obtaining construction permits c)property registration-digitization of land records d)Enforcing contracts(commercial disputes resolution)e)Corporate insolvency resolution f)Trading across Borders.
从2014年开始,印度为方便经商进行了惊人的改革。这个人甚至不了解已经做了什么,也不理解印度如何在世界银行的排名中上升到第63位。有一个完整的研究是关于印度在整个商业生命周期中所做的改革。简而言之,这些改革如下。如果有人需要,可以通过邮件发送详细的解释。
A、创业
B.获得建筑许可证
C.财产登记-土地记录的数字化
D、执行合同(商业纠纷解决)
E、公司破产的决议
F、跨境贸易。

Mogambo

Beating China is a tall order but I think we will reach 6.5tn-7tn GDP by 2030 which is absolutely possible as long we don’t get tangled up in a war.
And judging by the statements you’ve made previously you seem to agree with it.And you wouldn’t be investing if you didn’t believe this.
打败中国是一个很高的要求,但我认为我们将在2030年达到6.5万亿到7万亿,只要我们不要陷于战争,这是绝对可能实现的。
而从你之前的发言来看,你似乎也同意这一点。而且,如果你不相信这一点,你就不会去投资。

Shodhit Goyal

Reaching a1o trilion dollar economy by 2035 should be our target.
我们的目标应该是到2035年达到10万亿美元。

thomas dsouza

I think Akshat u should be our finance minister the way u give explanation on your research is brilliant
我认为博主你应该成为我们的财政部长,你对你研究的内容的解释方式太出色了。

SHOBNA MANDPE

Thanks for the information…
But one thing for sure
China’leaders worked sincerely for the growth of the country and their citizens.
But our leaders only work to expand their personal wealth.
Howcome we as common citizens hardly have any wealth but all our parliamentarians are millionaires and billionaires.
But the country is in doldrums
谢谢你提供的信息,但有一点是肯定的中国的领导人为国家和公民的发展真诚地工作。
但我们的领导人只为扩大他们的个人财富而工作。
为什么我们作为普通公民几乎没有任何财富,但我们的议员都是百万和亿万富翁,但国家却处于低迷状态。

soumitro kahali

Have been following you for a while.Your videos are interesting and well researched.I ONLY WISH YOU SPOKE A LITTLE SLC LY WITH PAUSES-it would help in better assimilation.
关注你有一段时间了。你的视频很有趣,而且研究得很透彻。我只希望你说话慢一点,有停顿,这将有助于我们更好地吸收理解你的观点。

SHASHANK SHARMA

Superb analysis sir
Being a STEM student I do feel that India needs to invest a lot more in research and development(currently onlyo.65%of GDP)and create better infrastructure and provide better stipends to masters and research scholars to retain them in Indi a.R&D could do wonders in India’s growth I feel very positively that a day would come when talented people would inve st their 20’s in cutting edge research rather than wasting it in preparing for government jobs.
精湛的分析,先生,作为一名理工科学生,我确实觉得印度需要在研发方面投入更多(目前只占GDP的0.65%),并建立更好的基础设施,为硕士和研究学者提供更好的津贴,这样可以把他们留在印度。研发可以给印度的增长创造奇迹,我非常乐观地认为,有一天,有才华的人在他们的20岁时把精力投入到最前沿的研究中,而不是把时间浪费在准备政府工作上。

Satvik Singh??

GDP also depends on population,compare India’s and bangladesh population
国内生产总值也取决于人口,比较一下印度和孟加拉国的人口。

Yash Kumar Jha

Akshat I can be wrong here but what I have known by my knowledge is that US sanctions are the main reason why Venezuela’s economy crashed,it was a socialist economy for decades but when the US put sanctions then only we observe a decline int he economy of Venezuela.I am not saying that other factors don’t account for its downfalls like too much dependence on oi I and gas but the main reason which by far stands for the failure of its economy is US sanctions,no intention to fight ju,st putting my viewpoint??
博主,我的说法可能是错的,但我所知道的是,美国的制裁是委内瑞拉经济崩溃的主要原因,它实施了几十年的社会主义经济,但当美国实施制裁时,我们才看到委内瑞拉经济的下降。我并不是说其他因素没有造成它的衰落,比如过于依赖石油和天然气,但到目前为止,代表其经济失败的主要原因是美国的制裁,无意争论,只是提出我的观点。

Devil

Great video once again…rotten political system and corrupt politicians are the biggest hindrance in the path of growth.
又一个很棒的视频,腐朽的政治制度和腐败的政客是经济增长道路上的最大障碍。

sujal maiti

Akshat,Just a question.From where do you upxe ur knowledge?
博主,我只有一个问题。你从什么驱动更新你的知识体系?

SA

unless we come out of the mindset of just replicating China we can’t do anything..why replicate?why can’t we think ofI ndia’s own pathway to achieve such huge GDP
除非我们从复制中国的心态中走出来,否则我们什么都做不了,为什么要复制?为什么我们不能思考印度自己的途径来实现如此巨大的GDP目标。

Mahesh D

Hi Akshat follow your videos almost every day.It’s best you focus on finance as I find your analogy and perception of history and politics is not right and in many cases incomplete.China even though focused on growth it used and iron handand dictatorsThese are same people who shaped our history.So you mean to say all these must brought under control of cen tre?Then immediately you and people will say we being a dictator.
晦,博主,我几乎每天都在关注你的视频。你最好专注于金融领域,因为我发现你对历史和政治的比喻和看法有失偏颇,在许多情况下是不完整的。中国即使专注于增长,但它使用了铁腕和独裁统治,这些人塑造了我们的历史。所以你的意思是说所有这些都必须由中央来控制?那之后你和人们就会说我们是一个独裁者。

Ponna Sulebhavi

Superb video Akshath!!Learn so much everyday from your videos,very confident that today can make firm viewpoints about the macro perspective of the world and with enough substantial backing.Please keep making such videos more!
优秀的视频!我从你的视频中每天都能学到很多东西,非常肯定这一点一今天可以从世界的宏观视角提出坚定的观点,并有足够的实质性支持。请继续制作更多这样的视频!

vishal vishu

It’s really great video!To the level that after watching this any Indian will get atleast an idea about where we are in the route of development and the blockages and also ways to rectify them.Really akshat sir proud to be watching ur videos on daily bases.Thanks??
这真的是很好的视频!任何一个印度人在看完这个视频后,至少可以了解我们在发展道路上所处的位置以及所面临的的障碍,包括纠正这些障碍的方法。真的,我为每天都能看到你的视频而自豪,谢谢。

Aditya Sharma

Biggest reason for india lagging behind:corruption Reason:Delhi’s budget as of last year was more than double of 2014.This single point should be enough specially when yo u realise that there are lot of freebies going on in delhi.Also petrol prices is cheapest in india here so this should al so be indicating something
When it comes to future growth,a year or 2 back delhi had more startups founded here than bangalore + health and educati)on infra is best in delhi
印度落后的最大原因:腐败
原因:德里去年的预算是2014年的两倍多。这一点就足够了,特别是当你意识到在德里有很多免费赠品的时候。此外,这里的汽油价格在印度是最便宜的,所以这也应该说明了一些问题。
说到未来的发展,一两年前,德里成立的初创企业比班加罗尔多,而且德里的卫生和教育设施是最好的。

Abhinav Pandey

But i also feel that BJP perhaps in the closest to a party which wants capitalism.They are no way a capitilist party tho ugh,and from 2014-2019 they started so many free schemes.Frankly,every other party in india are super socialist.
但我也觉得,印度人民党也许是最接近于一个想要资本主义的政党一虽然他们绝不是一个资本主义政党,从2014年到2019年,他们开始了许多免费计划。坦率地说,印度的其他每个政党都是超级社会主义。

Sub to hell

The data about China you showed in this video are more inflated at local level as well as national level.No sane person on earth couldn’t interpret China’s real numbers.Even Chinese Economists who live in exile are trying to make people awar eof it.Even the major economic firms couldn’t find the right numbers but they have no way so they use the Chinese govts tatistics to make growth projections.
A classical example for my argument is whenever Mckensey and other international firms make reports on growth projectionsof China’s GDP(Like GDP will grow 4-5%in the upcoming fy)The Chinese government’s statistics will show that they achie ved GDP growth like 5 percent so in that fy.Also when you add up Provincial GDP reported by the local govt it will be ins anely huge than the Central govt reported GDP.
So please don’t believe the Chinese data.
你在这段视频中展示的关于中国的数据在地方层面和国家层面都比较夸张。地球上任何一个正常人都无法解读中国的真实数据。即使是在外的中国经济学家也在努力让人们认识到这一点。即使是主要的经济公司也无法找到正确的数字,但他们没有办法,所以他们使用中国的统计数据来进行增长预测。
一个典型的例子是,每当麦肯锡和其他国际公司对中国GDP的增长预测做报告时(比如下一年度的GDP将增长4.5%),中国的统计数据会显示他们在该年度实现了5%的GDP增长。另外,当你把地方政府报告的省级GDP加起来时,会比中央政府报告的GDP大得多。

Arnav Khandekar

Appreciate you speaking on unification,nowadays we see lot of hatred which is not good for anything.
感谢你提到了统一,现在我们看到很多仇恨,这对任何事情的发展都没有好处。

javeed dhalayat

Very nice analysis Akshat.I think education can tackle many issues.It’ll also lead to improvement in women participatio n.Unification is also necessary,I hope people become more sensible….Being opmitistic on all??
非常好的分析。我认为教育可以解决很多问题。这也能提高女性参与度。统一也是必要的,希望大家理智一点。对所有事情都保持乐观。

Ravi kumar

In India the policy maker himself a dump and criminals.and selfish….this needs to be changed….creating employment is big challenge for any govt….creating big infrastructure can create jobs….food processing units can create more jobsi n rural area it also helps export processed foods….
在印度,政策制定者本身就是一个垃圾和罪犯。他们是非常自私的,这是需要改变的,创造就业对于任何政府来说都是巨大的挑战,创造大型基础设施可以创造就业机会,食品加工单位可以在农村地区创造更多的就业机会,也有助于出口加工食品。

Pradeep K

India should not follow the path of China instead we should have a balanced aproach for our growth without harming our na ture.Please talk about adverse effects of too much industrialization in china as well.Usually in your videos you talk ab out pros vs cons which is missing this time.
印度不应该走中国的道路,相反,我们应该在不损害自然的前提下,采取平衡的方法来实现我们的增长。请谈谈中国过多的工业化带来的负面影响。通常在你的视频中,你会谈论利与弊,但这次却没有。

Vidya

You are making an impact with your YouTube videos.But why are you settling down with this?Join politics and make countr y-size impact.Get some of your like-minded&like-brained friends and join the parties.Don’t stand in elections,tha t’s too small.But join the advisory boards.Advise the leaders,make decisions and shape the country to be progressive.T his may not be something you like.But give it a good thought;coz the cause is enormously significant.
你正在通过你的油管视频产生影响,但你为什么要安于现状呢?可以选择参政并产生国家级的影响。找一些志同道合的朋友,加入政党。不要参加选举,那对你来说无关紧要。但请加入顾问委员会。为领导出谋划策,做出决策,将国家塑造成一个进步的国家,这可能不是你喜欢做的事情。但是,请好好考虑一下;因为它是非常重要的。

Dach

the farm laws,which would have served everyone,was forced to be repealed….Indians dont have a mind that can think of its own,nor do people want development as long as they can fill their own pocket…..this country will never be awoke and stand as one and do the right things…that can happen only in a communist country….so please,stop comparing it with China…we can never get there…nothing personal…just facts….leaders are not the problem…u dont think we can o verthrow every corrupt leader?Ofcourse we can but we are divided in every which way…caste,creed,religion.China never had this major set back…so yea,we cant hold a candle to China as of now…it wont in my lifetime.India will remain a potential super power and never actually one.Brazil has a better chance at that than we…hell Bangladesh does….Becaus e they have more ideas and cohesion in the population.
在印度本应服务于每个人的农业法被迫废除,印度人没有为自己着想的头脑,只要能填满自己的口袋,他们也不想发展,这个国家永远不会觉醒。团结一致,做正确的事情,这种情况只能发生在一个共产主义国家,所以,请停止与中国的比较,我们永远不可能实现这一点,我没有针对的意思,我只是在陈述事实,领导人不是问题所在,毕竟我们可以推翻海个腐败的领导人,难道你不是这么想的吗?我们当然可以,但我们在每一个方面都是分裂的,种姓、信仰、宗教。在这些方面中国从来没有过阻碍,所以,我们现在还不能与中国相提并论,在我有生之年这种情况都不会发生。印度仍将是一个潜在的超级大国,但实际上从未成为超级大国。巴西比我们更有机会成为超级大国,孟加拉国也是如此,因为他们人民更有想法,更有凝聚力。